UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
______________
FORM 10-Q
______________
ý Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2005
Or
¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Transition Period From to
Commission file number 0-33169
______________
CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
______________
Delaware | 13-4066229 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or organization) | Identification Number) |
6551 Park of Commerce Blvd, N.W.
Boca Raton, Florida 33487
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(561) 998-2232
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ý No ¨
The registrant had outstanding 32,290,041 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, as of July 31, 2005.
CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE, INC.
INDEX
FORM 10-Q
JUNE 30, 2005
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | ||
|
| |||
|
| |||
| ||||
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
| ||||
ITEM 1.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands)
June 30, 2005 | December 31, 2004 | ||||||
Current assets: |
| ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | | $ | | |||
Accounts receivable, net | 101,494 | 95,439 | |||||
Income taxes receivable | 6,583 | 3,100 | |||||
Deferred income taxes | 5,889 | 4,949 | |||||
Other current assets | 23,438 | 13,199 | |||||
Total current assets | 137,404 | 116,687 | |||||
Property and equipment, net | 15,209 | 11,840 | |||||
Goodwill, net | 302,854 | 302,854 | |||||
Trademarks, net | 15,499 | 15,499 | |||||
Other identifiable intangible assets, net | 6,102 | 6,814 | |||||
Other assets, net | 1,632 | 2,301 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 478,700 | $ | 455,995 | |||
Current liabilities: | |||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 5,553 | $ | 5,993 | |||
Accrued employee compensation and benefits | 49,238 | 32,031 | |||||
Current portion of long-term debt and note payable | 2,600 | 2,408 | |||||
Other current liabilities | 4,305 | 4,326 | |||||
Total current liabilities | 61,696 | 44,758 | |||||
Deferred income taxes | 28,835 | 24,996 | |||||
Long-term debt | 35,770 | 39,867 | |||||
Total liabilities | 126,301 | 109,621 | |||||
Commitments and contingencies | |||||||
Stockholders' equity: | |||||||
Common stock | 3 | 3 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 258,320 | 257,180 | |||||
Other stockholders' equity | 94,076 | 89,191 | |||||
Total stockholders' equity | 352,399 | 346,374 | |||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 478,700 | $ | 455,995 |
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
1
Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||
Revenue from services | $ | 159,000 | $ | 163,795 | $ | 317,036 | $ | 332,662 | |||||||
Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Direct operating expenses | 127,714 | 127,216 | 251,170 | 259,660 | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 26,562 | 25,278 | 52,086 | 49,904 | |||||||||||
Bad debt expense | 37 | 483 | 439 | 1,099 | |||||||||||
Depreciation | 1,215 | 1,318 | 2,345 | 2,874 | |||||||||||
Amortization | 356 | 356 | 712 | 868 | |||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 155,884 | 154,651 | 306,752 | 314,405 | |||||||||||
Income from operations | 3,116 | 9,144 | 10,284 | 18,257 | |||||||||||
Other expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net | 952 | 1,157 | 1,869 | 2,563 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | 2,164 | 7,987 | 8,415 | 15,694 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | 838 | 3,059 | 3,257 | 6,042 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | 1,326 | 4,928 | 5,158 | 9,652 | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | (77 | ) | 169 | (273 | ) | 302 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,249 | $ | 5,097 | $ | 4,885 | $ | 9,954 | |||||||
Net income/(loss) per common share - basic: | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.30 | |||||||
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | (0.00 | ) | 0.01 | (0.01 | ) | 0.01 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.31 | |||||||
Net income/(loss) per common share - diluted: | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.30 | |||||||
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | (0.00 | ) | 0.01 | (0.01 | ) | 0.01 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.31 | |||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic | 32,253 | 31,974 | 32,230 | 31,918 | |||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding-diluted | 32,775 | 32,584 | 32,728 | 32,578 |
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
2
Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Operating activities | |||||||
Net income | $ | 4,885 | $ | 9,954 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash | |||||||
Depreciation | 2,345 | 2,874 | |||||
Amortization | 712 | 868 | |||||
Bad debt expense | 439 | 1,099 | |||||
Deferred income tax expense | 2,899 | 3,743 | |||||
Other non-cash charges | 700 | 343 | |||||
Loss (income) from discontinued operations | 273 | (302 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||
Accounts receivable | (6,592 | ) | 8,914 | ||||
Income tax receivable and other current assets | (13,552 | ) | (2,650 | ) | |||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 17,747 | 1,145 | |||||
Income tax payable and other current liabilities | 239 | 1,037 | |||||
Net cash provided by continuing operations | 10,095 | 27,025 | |||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net | (273 | ) | 302 | ||||
Depreciation, amortization and bad debt expense | | 167 | |||||
Change in net assets from discontinued operations | (170 | ) | (776 | ) | |||
Net cash used in discontinued operations | (443 | ) | (307 | ) | |||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 9,652 | 26,718 | |||||
Investing activities | |||||||
Acquisitions and earnout payments | | (30 | ) | ||||
Purchases of property and equipment | (4,023 | ) | (2,913 | ) | |||
Investing activites of discontinued operations: | |||||||
Earn out payments related to discontinued business | | (1,548 | ) | ||||
Other investing activities of discontinued operations | (816 | ) | (12 | ) | |||
Net cash used in investing activities | (4,839 | ) | (4,503 | ) | |||
Financing activities | |||||||
Repayment of debt | (85,300 | ) | (103,602 | ) | |||
Proceeds from issuance of debt | 79,570 | 79,425 | |||||
Other financing activities | 917 | 1,973 | |||||
Financing activities of discontinued operations: | |||||||
Other financing activities of discontinued operations | | (11 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (4,813 | ) | (22,215 | ) | |||
Change in cash and cash equivalents | | | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | | $ | | |||
Supplemental disclosures of noncash investing and financing activities: | |||||||
Equipment purchased through financing agreements | $ | 1,719 | $ | |
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
3
CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
1.
ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. and its wholly-owned direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by U. S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2005. These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2004, included in the Companys Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The December 31, 2004 unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet included herein was derived from the December 31, 2004 audited consolidated balance sheet included in the Companys Form 10-K.
2.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
3.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
In accordance with the requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share, basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding including the vested portion of restricted shares. The denominator used to calculate diluted earnings per share reflects the dilutive effects of stock options and nonvested restricted stock (as calculated utilizing the treasury stock method). Certain shares of common stock that are issuable upon the exercise of options have been excluded from per share calculations because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
4
4.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company, from time to time, grants stock options for a fixed number of common shares to employees, and annually to members of its Board of Directors who are neither members of the Companys management nor designees of its private equity sponsor stockholders. In the six month period ending June 30, 2005, the Company granted 314,450 stock options to its eligible employees and non-employee directors. The Company accounts for these stock option grants in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and accordingly, recognizes no compensation expense for stock option grants when the exercise price of the options equals, or is greater than, the average market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant.
The pro-forma disclosure of stock based compensation required by FASB Statement No. 148, Accounting for Stock Based CompensationTransition and Disclosure, is shown below.
The Companys consolidated net income during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, would have changed to the pro forma amounts set forth below had the Companys stock option grants been accounted for under the fair value based method prescribed by FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||||||
Net income as reported | $ | 1,249 | $ | 5,097 | $ | 4,885 | $ | 9,954 | |||||
Stock based employee compensation included in | | | | | |||||||||
Stock based employee compensation, net of tax, | (252 | ) | (237 | ) | (461 | ) | (453 | ) | |||||
Pro forma net income applying FASB Statement No. 123 | $ | 997 | $ | 4,860 | $ | 4,424 | $ | 9,501 | |||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share as reported: | |||||||||||||
Net income per common share-basic | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.31 | |||||
Net income per common share-diluted | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.31 | |||||
Pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share: | |||||||||||||
Pro forma net income per common share-basic | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.30 | |||||
Pro forma net income per common share-diluted | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.29 |
5
5.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The Company has adopted the provisions of FASB Statement No. 144, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and supersedes FASB Statement No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of, and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions.
The following details amounts of revenue and (loss) income from discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 648 | $ | 3,682 | $ | 1,194 | $ | 7,597 | |||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations before income taxes | $ | (126 | ) | $ | 274 | $ | (446 | ) | $ | 491 | |||
Income taxes on discontinued operations | 49 | (105 | ) | 173 | (189 | ) | |||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations | $ | (77 | ) | $ | 169 | $ | (273 | ) | $ | 302 |
The Companys investment philosophy with respect to its non-nurse staffing businesses is that the businesses should provide strategic synergy to the Company and deliver consistent profitability so that the Company does not apply disproportionate management attention to a relatively small component of its business mix. The Company had been evaluating its commitment to its consulting businesses as a result of significant volatility in these businesses when the Company was approached by Mitretek Systems, Inc. (Mitretek), which was interested in expanding its healthcare consulting presence. Mitretek viewed two of the three practices as fits to its strategy and offered to purchase them. On October 4, 2004, the Company sold assets of its Gill/Balsano Consulting, LLC (Gill/Balsano) and Jennings Ryan & Kolb (JRK) consulting practices to Mitretek for $12.3 million in cash less a working capital payment of $1.6 million, in lieu primarily of accounts receivable retained by the Company.
Separately, in the fourth quarter of 2004, the Companys Board of Directors approved a plan to pursue a sale with respect to its Cejka Consulting practice that was not acquired by Mitretek. Cejka Consulting was previously a part of TravCorps, which was acquired by the Company in December 1999. Cejka Consulting, along with the aforementioned disposed practices and some subsidiary level infrastructure costs comprised the Companys Cross Country Consulting, Inc. (CCC Inc.) subsidiary, which was a component of the Companys other human capital management services business segment. The Company determined that, as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the CCC Inc. subsidiary substantially met the criteria to report the pending sale as Assets Held for Sale and the subsidiary as Discontinued Operations in accordance with FASB Statement No. 144. The Company has account ed for CCC Inc. as such within the condensed consolidated statements of income and cash flows and notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.
Upon reclassification in the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company reallocated goodwill between the remaining Cejka consulting business and the other business included in the same reporting unit for FASB Statement No. 142 purposes. The Company then conducted an assessment of the tangible and intangible net assets of the Cejka Consulting practice as a result of the above reclassification in accordance with FASB Statement No. 144 and FASB Statement No. 142. Based on this assessment, the Company determined that the carrying amount of the net assets as then reflected on the Companys consolidated balance sheet exceeded its estimated fair value. In accordance with the assessment, the Company recorded an impairment of other tangible assets in the amount of $0.4 million. The Company used the then most recent indication of interest as the basis for determining fair value. During the three month period ending June&n bsp;30, 2005, the Company determined that no further adjustment to the valuation allowance was necessary.
6
The following chart details the major classes of assets held for sale and the comparative amounts at December 31, 2004:
June 30, | December 31, | ||||||
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | |||||||
Accounts receivable, net | $ | 1,043 | $ | 1,183 | |||
Other assets | 99 | 83 | |||||
Total assets | 1,142 | 1,266 | |||||
Valuation allowance | (446 | ) | (446 | ) | |||
Net assets held for sale | $ | 696 | $ | 820 |
Net assets held for sale are included in other current assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Liabilities related to assets held for sale were not considered material for separate disclosure and are included in other current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2004. There were no liabilities held for sale as of June 30, 2005. The Company does not anticipate any involvement in the Cejka consulting business subsequent to the sale of the remaining business and expects any related cash outflows to discontinue shortly after the sale is completed.
During the six month period ended June 30, 2004, the Company paid approximately $0.7 million and $0.9 million in earnout payments for Gill/Balsano and JRK, respectively, in accordance with their purchase agreements.
6.
DEBT
The Company has a $200.0 million senior secured credit facility which consists of a $125.0 million term loan with staggered maturities through June 2009, and a five year $75.0 million revolving credit facility. Debt issuance costs related to the credit facility totaled $1.6 million, net, and $2.3 million, net, as of June 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, respectively. Debt issuance costs are recorded in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. These costs are being amortized using the effective interest rate method over the life of the credit facility.
The senior credit facility allows for the issuance of letters of credit in an aggregate face amount at any time outstanding not in excess of $25.0 million as of June 30, 2005. Additionally, swingline loans, as defined in the senior credit facility, not to exceed an aggregate principal amount at any time outstanding of $10.0 million, are available under the senior credit facility. As of June 30, 2005, $11.4 million was outstanding under the letter of credit facility leaving $63.6 million available under the revolving credit facility.
During the six month period ended June 30, 2005, the Company repaid $5.4 million on the term loan portion of its credit facility, of which $4.4 million were optional prepayments. The aggregate scheduled maturities of the term loan portion of the Companys senior credit facility, as of June 30, 2005, are as follows, including amounts due for the remainder of 2005:
Year ending December 31: | (Unaudited, | |||
2005 | $ | 1,016 | ||
2006 | 2,034 | |||
2007 | 2,034 | |||
2008 | 16,268 | |||
| 2009 | 15,252 | ||
Thereafter | | |||
$ | 36,604 |
At June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company had $1.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in capital lease obligations recorded as debt on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Subsequent to June 30, 2005, the Company made an optional prepayment of $2.0 million on the term loan portion of its credit facility.
7
7.
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
On November 4, 2002, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program whereby the Company may purchase up to 1.5 million of its common shares at an aggregate price not to exceed $25.0 million. There were no stock repurchases during the six month period ending June 30, 2005. During the six month period ended June 30, 2004, the Company purchased 16,400 shares of common stock at an average cost of $15.94 per share pursuant to this program. The cost of such purchases was approximately $0.3 million. All of these shares were retired as of June 30, 2004.
The Company can purchase up to an additional 469,600 shares at an aggregate price not to exceed approximately $10.8 million under the previously authorized stock repurchase program. This repurchase program is within the limits of the Companys current senior secured credit facility covenants. Under this program, the shares may be purchased from time-to-time in the open market. The repurchase program may be discontinued at any time at the discretion of the Company. At June 30, 2005, the Company had approximately 32.3 million shares outstanding.
On November 3, 2004, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the registration of approximately 11.4 million shares of common stock owned by its private equity sponsor stockholders. No members of management registered shares pursuant to this registration statement. On April 14, 2005, the Company announced a public offering of approximately 4.2 million shares of common stock pursuant to this Form S-3 shelf registration statement. All net proceeds from the sale went to the selling stockholders. However, the Company incurred all fees and expenses relating to the registration statement.
8.
SEGMENT DATA
Information on operating segments and a reconciliation to income from continuing operations before income taxes for the periods indicated are as follows:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2005 | 2004 (a) | 2005 | 2004 (a) | ||||||||||
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | (Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Revenue from unaffiliated customers: | |||||||||||||
Healthcare staffing | $ | 147,172 | $ | 153,187 | $ | 293,958 | $ | 312,317 | |||||
Other human capital management services | 11,828 | 10,608 | 23,078 | 20,345 | |||||||||
$ | 159,000 | $ | 163,795 | $ | 317,036 | $ | 332,662 | ||||||
Contribution income (b): | |||||||||||||
Healthcare staffing | $ | 9,531 | $ | 15,015 | $ | 22,540 | $ | 30,587 | |||||
Other human capital management services | 2,112 | 1,928 | 4,161 | 3,336 | |||||||||
Unallocated corporate overhead | 6,956 | 6,125 | 13,360 | 11,924 | |||||||||
Depreciation | 1,215 | 1,318 | 2,345 | 2,874 | |||||||||
Amortization | 356 | 356 | 712 | 868 | |||||||||
Interest expense, net | 952 | 1,157 | 1,869 | 2,563 | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 2,164 | $ | 7,987 | $ | 8,415 | $ | 15,694 |
(a)
The prior period has been reclassified to conform to the 2005 presentation, primarily the reclassification of Cross Country Consulting, Inc.s results from operations from continuing operations to discontinued operations. Cross Country Consulting, Inc. was previously included in the other human capital management services business segment.
(b)
The Company defines contribution income as income from continuing operations before interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and corporate expenses not specifically identified to a reporting segment. Contribution income is a financial measure used by management when assessing segment performance and is provided in accordance with FASB No. 131, Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.
8
9.
CONTINGENCIES
The Companys Cross Country TravCorps and Cross Country Nurses, Inc. subsidiaries are the subjects of a class action lawsuit filed in the Superior Court of California in Orange County alleging, among other things, violations of certain sections of the California Labor Code, unfair competition and breach of contract. The lawsuit has not yet been certified by the court as a class action. As a result, the Company is unable at this time to determine its potential exposure. The Company intends to vigorously defend this matter.
In the six month period ending June 30, 2005, the Companys MedStaff subsidiary became the subject of a purported class action lawsuit filed on February 18, 2005 in the Superior Court of California in Riverside County. The lawsuit only relates to MedStaff corporate employees. It alleges, among other things, violations of certain sections of the California Labor Code, the California Business and Professions Code, and recovery of unpaid wages and penalties. MedStaff currently has less than 50 corporate employees in California. The plaintiffs, Maureen Petray and Carina Higareda purport to sue on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, allege that MedStaff failed, under California law, to provide meal period and rest breaks and pay for those missed meal periods and rest breaks; failed to compensate the employees for all hours worked; failed to compensate the employees for working overtime ; and failed to keep appropriate records to keep track of time worked. Plaintiffs seek, among other things, an order enjoining MedStaff from engaging in the practices challenged in the complaint; for an order for full restitution of all monies MedStaff allegedly failed to pay plaintiffs and their purported class; for interest; for certain penalties provided for by the California Labor Code; and for attorneys fees and costs. The lawsuit is in its very early stages and has not yet been certified by the court as a class action. As a result, the Company is unable to determine its potential exposure, if any, and intends to vigorously defend this matter.
The Company and its subsidiary, Cross Country TravCorps, Inc., became the subject of two medical malpractice lawsuits filed in December 2002 and March 2003, respectively, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois. Both lawsuits relate to nursing services provided by nurses supplied by Cross Country TravCorps to a hospital located in Chicago, Illinois. The lawsuits allege that the nurses supplied by Cross Country TravCorps were negligent in their care and treatment of Plaintiffs who were maternity patients at the facility in Chicago. The nurses alleged negligent failure to appropriately monitor each Plaintiff in their labor and delivery allegedly caused the minor Plaintiffs to suffer severe, permanent and disabling brain injuries. In addition to the hospital facility and physicians, the Company, Cross Country TravCorps and the individual nurses have been named as direct defendants in the lawsuits . The Company intends to vigorously defend these matters. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Company increased its reserve for professional liability insurance by $5.3 million, pretax, based on unfavorable developments relating to these cases. The Company records an insurance recovery receivable related to professional liability claims in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force No. 03-08, Accounting for Claims-Made Insurance and Retroactive Insurance Contracts by the Insured Entity. At June 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, the Company had recorded $25.0 million and $8.7 million of accrued professional liability which are included in accrued employee compensation and benefits on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company has estimated recoveries available from its insurance carriers of $10.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, which are included in other current assets on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The Company is also subject to other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. In the opinion of management, the outcome of these other matters will not have a significant effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations.
10.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In April 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that FASB Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which requires all companies to measure compensation cost for all share-based payments (including employee stock options) at fair value, has been deferred for certain public companies. FASB Statement No. 123(R) requires companies to expense the fair value of all stock options that have future vesting provisions, are modified, or are newly granted beginning on the grant date of such options. The Company intends to adopt this standard on January 1, 2006.
9
In May 2005, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which replaces Accounting Principle Board Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and FASB Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. FASB No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of changes in accounting principles, requiring retrospective application to prior periods financial statements, unless it is impracticable to do so. This statement is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Companys condensed consolidated financial statements present a consolidation of all its operations. This discussion supplements the detailed information presented in the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto which should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in the Companys Form 10-K, filed for the year ended December 31, 2004, and is intended to assist the reader in understanding the financial results and condition of the Company.
Certain prior period information has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
OVERVIEW
During the first six months ended June 30, 2005, our healthcare staffing business segment represented approximately 93% of our revenue and was comprised of travel and per diem nurse staffing, allied health staffing as well as clinical research trials staffing. Travel nurse staffing represented approximately 74% of this business segments revenue. Our other human capital management services business segment represented approximately 7% of our year to date 2005 revenue and consisted of education and training, and retained physician and healthcare executive search services.
In the three months ended June 30, 2005, our revenue decreased 2.9% or $4.8 million, to $159.0 million compared to $163.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004. Net income decreased $3.8 million, or 75.5%, to $1.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005, from $5.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004. Our revenue and net income were negatively impacted by lower volumes in our nurse staffing businesses, and a significant increase in insurance related costs in our travel nurse business. These impacts were partially offset by improved volumes in our clinical trials staffing, allied staffing, international recruitment, and other human capital management services businesses. The second quarter volume trends were similar to the first quarter trends, although the rate of decline in nurse staffing volumes had moderated.
Contract bookings weakened throughout 2003 and 2004, in part, due to a more cautious buying process on the part of acute care hospital customers which reduced the level of demand for our nurse staffing services. Concurrently, we believe this reduced the level of interest of nursing professionals in pursing temporary employment opportunities. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, volume in our nurse staffing business was negatively impacted by this dynamic. Additionally, we believe that there was a lack of urgency to fill orders on the part of our hospital clients due to relatively weak patient census during December 2004 and January 2005, as well as the delay in the implementation of the more stringent nurse-patient ratio regulations in California that impacted the first quarter. The number of orders from hospitals and number of applications received from nurses have been steadily increasing sin ce the fourth quarter of 2004.
For the three months ended June 30, 2005, contract bookings for future assignments increased compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004 and the first quarter of 2005. We believe this may translate into sequentially higher staffing volumes in the third quarter as contract bookings for future assignments are a leading indicator of future volume in our nurse staffing operations. We have made investments in our nursing recruitment capacity during 2005 to allow us to grow our nurse staffing business as demand and supply increase.
Longer term, improvement in overall job creation in the economy would provide many staff nurses with increased household income and greater confidence in being able to reduce the amount of regular and overtime hours they provide directly to hospital employers compared to the last two years. We believe that the perception of increased demand will give nurses confidence to seek alternative employment opportunities which could increase staff turnover in hospitals as implied by recent U.S. Bureau Labor of Statistics data. We believe these dynamics would lead to an increase in the demand for our services and encourage more nurses to actively seek travel assignments and apply with us. In general, we believe nurses are more willing to seek travel assignments during
10
relatively high levels of demand for contract employment, and conversely, are more reluctant to seek travel assignments during and immediately following periods of weak demand for contract employment. We also believe demand for travel nurse staffing services will be favorably impacted in the long term by an aging population and an increasing shortage of nurses.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, selected statement of income data expressed as a percentage of revenue:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
(Unaudited) |
| (Unaudited) | |||||||
Revenue from services | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |
Direct operating expenses | 80.3 | 77.7 | 79.2 | 78.1 | |||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 16.7 | 15.4 | 16.4 | 15.0 | |||||
Bad debt expense | 0.0 |
| 0.3 |
| 0.1 |
| 0.3 | ||
Depreciation and amortization | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | |||||
Income from operations | 2.0 | 5.6 | 3.3 | 5.5 | |||||
Interest expense, net | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.8 | |||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | 1.4 | 4.9 | 2.7 | 4.7 | |||||
Income tax expense | 0.5 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 1.8 | |||||
Income from continuing operations | 0.9 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 2.9 | |||||
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | (0.1 | ) | 0.1 | (0.1 | ) | 0.1 | |||
Net income | 0.8 | % | 3.1 | % | 1.6 | % | 3.0 | % |
Three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to three months ended June 30, 2004
REVENUE FROM SERVICES decreased $4.8 million, or 2.9%, to $159.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $163.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in revenue from our healthcare staffing businesses partially offset by an increase in revenue from our other human capital management services. The decrease in healthcare staffing was primarily from our domestic travel nurse staffing operations and was partially offset by an increase in our clinical trials staffing and international nurse recruitment businesses. The increase in other human capital management services was due to increases in both our educational seminars and retained search businesses. See Segment Information below for further analysis.
DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSES are comprised primarily of field employee compensation expenses, housing expenses, travel expenses and various insurance expenses associated with our field employees. Direct operating expenses totaled $127.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $127.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. As a percentage of revenue, direct operating expenses represented 80.3% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 77.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2004. This increase in direct operating expenses as a percentage of revenue is due to significantly higher insurance reserves in the nurse staffing business, which accounted for 332 basis points of the increase. We increased our insurance reserves in the three months ended June 30, 2005 by approximately $5.3 million based on recent unfavorable developments as described in the legal proceedings section herein. This increase was partially offset by a higher relative mix of business from our other human capital management services business segment that operates with relatively lower direct costs than our healthcare staffing business segment.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES totaled $26.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $25.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. As a percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses were 16.7% and 15.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, reflecting a combination of negative operating leverage resulting from a decline in volume, higher relative mix of business from our other human capital management services business segment, increased investments in recruitment capacity and higher corporate healthcare insurance expenses. Our other human capital management services businesses operate at a higher selling, general and administrative costs than our healthcare staffing business segment.
11
BAD DEBT EXPENSE was less than $0.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005, which represented less than 0.1% of revenue compared to $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, which represented 0.3% of revenue. The Company reversed certain reserves relating to accounts that were collected in the three months ended June 30, 2005.
INTEREST EXPENSE, NET totaled $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. This decrease was primarily due to lower average borrowings outstanding during the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004, partially offset by a higher effective interest rate in the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004. Average borrowings outstanding were lower in the three months ended June 30, 2005 due to repayments of debt. The effective interest rate, excluding the amortization of debt issuance costs, for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was 8.2% compared to a rate of 5.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2004.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE totaled $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $3.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The effective tax rate was 38.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 38.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2004.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF INCOME TAXES totaled $(0.1) million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. We have accounted for Cross Country Consulting, Inc. as discontinued operations since December 31, 2004. On October 4, 2004, we sold assets two of our three consulting practices to a third party. Accordingly, the three months ended June 30, 2005 do not include the results of the sold operations.
Six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to six months ended June 30, 2004
REVENUE FROM SERVICES decreased $15.6 million, or 4.7%, to $317.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $332.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in revenue from our healthcare staffing businesses partially offset by an increase in our other human capital management services. The decrease in healthcare staffing was primarily from our domestic travel nurse staffing operations and was partially offset by an increase in our clinical trials staffing and international nurse recruitment businesses. The increase in other human capital management services was due to increases in both our educational seminars and retained search businesses. See Segment Information below for further analysis.
DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSES totaled $251.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $259.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. As a percentage of revenue, direct operating expenses represented 79.2% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 78.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2004. This increase in direct operating expenses as a percentage of revenue is due to significantly higher insurance reserves in the nurse staffing business which accounted for 167 basis points of the increase. We increased our insurance reserves in the six months ended June 30, 2005 by approximately $5.3 million based on recent unfavorable developments as described in the legal proceedings section herein. This increase was partially offset by a higher relative mix of business from our other human capital management services business segment that operates with relatively lower direct costs than our healthcare staffing business segment.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES totaled $52.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $49.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. As a percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses were 16.4% and 15.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, reflecting a combination of negative operating leverage resulting from a decline in volume, higher relative mix of business from our other human capital management services business segment, increased investments in recruitment capacity and higher corporate healthcare insurance expenses. Our other human capital management services businesses operate at a higher selling, general and administrative costs than our healthcare staffing business segment.
BAD DEBT EXPENSE totaled $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, which represented approximately 0.1% of revenue compared to $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, which represented 0.3% of revenue. The Company reversed certain reserves relating to accounts that were collected in the six months ended June 30, 2005.
12
NET INTEREST EXPENSE totaled $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. This decrease was primarily due to lower average borrowings outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004, partially offset by a higher effective interest rate in the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004. Average borrowings outstanding were lower in the six months ended June 30, 2005 due to repayments of debt. The effective interest rate, excluding the amortization of debt issuance costs, for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was 7.9% compared to a rate of 5.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2004.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE totaled $3.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $6.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The effective tax rate was 38.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 38.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2004.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF INCOME TAXES totaled $(0.3) million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. We have accounted for Cross Country Consulting, Inc. as discontinued operations since December 31, 2004. On October 4, 2004, we sold assets of two of our three consulting practices to a third party. Accordingly, the six months ended June 30, 2005 do not include the results of the sold operations.
SEGMENT INFORMATION
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, selected statements of income data by segment in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2005 | 2004 (a) | 2005 | 2004 (a) | ||||||||||
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | (Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Revenue from unaffiliated customers: | |||||||||||||
Healthcare staffing | $ | 147,172 | $ | 153,187 | $ | 293,958 | $ | 312,317 | |||||
Other human capital management services | 11,828 | 10,608 | 23,078 | 20,345 | |||||||||
$ | 159,000 | $ | 163,795 | $ | 317,036 | $ | 332,662 | ||||||
Contribution income (b): | |||||||||||||
Healthcare staffing | $ | 9,531 | $ | 15,015 | $ | 22,540 | $ | 30,587 | |||||
Other human capital management services | 2,112 | 1,928 | 4,161 | 3,336 | |||||||||
Unallocated corporate overhead | 6,956 | 6,125 | 13,360 | 11,924 | |||||||||
Depreciation | 1,215 | 1,318 | 2,345 | 2,874 | |||||||||
Amortization | 356 | 356 | 712 | 868 | |||||||||
Interest expense, net | 952 | 1,157 | 1,869 | 2,563 | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 2,164 | $ | 7,987 | $ | 8,415 | $ | 15,694 |
(a)
The prior period has been reclassified to conform to the 2005 presentation, primarily the reclassification of Cross Country Consulting, Inc.s results from operations from continuing operations to discontinued operations. Cross Country Consulting, Inc. was previously included in the other human capital management services business segment.
(b)
We define contribution income as income from continuing operations before interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and corporate expenses not specifically identified to a reporting segment. Contribution income is a financial measure used by management when assessing segment performance and is provided in accordance with FASB No. 131, Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.
13
Three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to three months ended June 30, 2004
HEALTHCARE STAFFING
Revenue from our healthcare staffing business segment decreased $6.0 million, or 3.9%, from $153.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $147.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease was due to a decline in the average number of full time equivalents (FTEs), representing $6.6 million of the decrease, partially offset by a favorable change in price and mix.
The average number of FTEs on contract decreased 4.3% from the prior year. This decrease in FTEs was attributable to a decrease in FTEs from our nurse staffing operations and partially offset by higher FTEs in our clinical trials staffing, allied staffing and international recruitment businesses. Our nurse staffing operations experienced a weakening throughout 2003 and 2004 due to a more cautious buying process on the part of acute care hospital customers, which reduced the level of demand for our nurse staffing services and also reduced the level of interest of nursing professionals in pursuing temporary employment opportunities.
Revenue per FTE and average bill rates were essentially flat in the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the three month period ended June 30, 2004. Mobile contracts, where the nurse is on the hospital payroll, accounted for approximately 1% of our volume in our healthcare staffing business segment in the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2% of our volume in the three month period ending June 30, 2004.
For the three months ended June 30, 2005, nurse staffing operations generated 85.0% of healthcare staffing revenue and 15.0% was generated by all other operations. For the three month period ended June 30, 2004, 87.2% of healthcare staffing revenue was generated from nursing operations and 12.8% was generated by all other operations. This change in mix is due to the combined effects of a decrease in revenue from nurse staffing operations and an increase in revenue generated by other operations.
Contribution income from our healthcare staffing segment for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 decreased 36.5%, or $5.5 million, from $15.0 million to $9.5 million. As a percentage of healthcare staffing revenue, contribution income was 6.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to 9.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Our profitability was negatively impacted by significantly higher insurance costs due to the increase in reserves recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2005, which reduced contribution margins by 359 basis points.
OTHER HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Revenue from other human capital management services increased 11.5%, or $1.2 million, from $10.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $11.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was primarily due to higher revenue from both our educational seminars and retained search businesses. Higher revenue from our educational seminars business resulted primarily from an increase in the number of seminars and average price per seminar partially offset by lower attendance per seminar.
Contribution income from other human capital management services for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 increased 9.5% to $2.1 million from $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. This increase was primarily due to the increase in revenue from our search businesses. Contribution income as a percentage of other human capital management services revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2005 decreased to 17.9% from 18.2% in the year earlier period. Operating margins in our educational seminars business were negatively impacted by higher costs primarily due to lower attendance per seminar combined with an increase in the number of seminars. This decrease offset the positive impact of improved operating leverage in our search business.
UNALLOCATED CORPORATE OVERHEAD
Unallocated corporate overhead was $7.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to $6.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004. This increase was primarily due to higher compensation and insurance costs. As a percentage of consolidated revenue, unallocated corporate overhead was 4.4% during the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to 3.7% during the three months ended June 30, 2004.
14
Six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to six months ended June 30, 2004
HEALTHCARE STAFFING
Revenue from our healthcare staffing business segment decreased $18.3 million, or 5.9%, from $312.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $294.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease was due to a decrease in the average number of full time equivalents (FTEs), representing $17.8 million of the decrease, and the remainder due to price and mix.
The average number of FTEs on contract decreased 5.5% from the prior year. This decrease in FTEs was due to a decrease in FTEs from our nurse staffing operations and partially offset by higher FTEs in our clinical trials staffing, allied staffing and international recruitment businesses. Our nurse staffing operations have experienced a weakening throughout 2003 and 2004 due to a more cautious buying process on the part of acute care hospital customers which reduced the level of demand for our nurse staffing services, and subsequently reduced the level of interest of nursing professionals in pursuing temporary employment opportunities.
Revenue per FTE and average bill rates for the six months ended June 30, 2005 were essentially flat compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004. Mobile contracts, where the nurse is on the hospital payroll, accounted for approximately 1% of our volume in our healthcare staffing business segment in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2% of our volume in the six month period ending June 30, 2004.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005, nurse staffing operations generated 85.1% of healthcare staffing revenue and 14.9% was generated by all other operations. For the six month period ended June 30, 2004, 87.8% of healthcare staffing revenue was generated from nursing operations and 12.2% was generated by all other operations. This change in mix is due to the combined effects of a decrease in revenue from nurse staffing operations and an increase in revenue generated by other operations.
Contribution income from our healthcare staffing segment for the six months ended June 30, 2005 decreased 26.3%, or $8.0 million, from $30.6 million to $22.5 million. As a percentage of healthcare staffing revenue, contribution income was 7.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to 9.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Our profitability was negatively impacted by the significantly higher insurance reserves recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2005, which reduced contribution margins by 180 basis points. In addition, increased investments in recruitment capacity in 2005 negatively impacted contribution margins.
OTHER HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Revenue from other human capital management services increased 13.4%, or $2.7 million, from $20.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $23.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was due to higher revenue from both our educational seminars and retained search businesses. Higher revenue from our educational seminars business resulted from an increase in the number of seminars and average price per seminar partially offset by lower attendance per seminar.
Contribution income from other human capital management services for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased 24.7% to $4.2 million from $3.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. This increase was primarily due to the increase in revenue from our search businesses. Contribution income as a percentage of other human capital management services revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased to 18.0% from 16.4% due to improved operating leverage in our search business.
UNALLOCATED CORPORATE OVERHEAD
Unallocated corporate overhead was $13.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to $11.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2004. This increase was primarily due to higher corporate compensation, higher public company expenses related to compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and higher health insurance costs. As a percentage of consolidated revenue, unallocated corporate overhead was 4.2% during the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to 3.6% during the six months ended June 30, 2004.
15
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of June 30, 2005, we had a current ratio (the amount of current assets divided by current liabilities) of 2.2 to 1.0 compared to 2.6 to 1.0 as of December 31, 2004. Working capital increased by $3.8 million to $75.7 as of June 30, 2005, compared to $71.9 million as of December 31, 2004. This increase in working capital was primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, net cash provided by operating activities was used primarily to purchase property and equipment and repay debt.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $9.7 million compared to $26.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. This decrease is primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable in the six month period ended June 30, 2005 compared to a decrease in the six month period ended June 30, 2004. Days sales outstanding increased 3 days from 55 days for the three month period ended December 31, 2004 to 58 days for the three month period ended June 30, 2005. This compares to an improvement in days sales outstanding of 3 days in the prior years comparable period.
Investing activities used $4.8 million of cash in the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to $4.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2004. Investing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2005 were attributable to capital expenditures and the completion of contractually obligated net working capital payments made by us pertaining to the sale of two of our consulting practices included in discontinued operations. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, investing activities included capital expenditures but also included earnout payments relating to previous acquisitions.
Net cash used in financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $4.8 million compared to $22.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2004. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, we repaid $5.4 million of the term loan portion of debt, which included optional prepayments on our term loan of $4.4 million. Other financing activities included the proceeds from the exercise of stock options.
Our operating cash flows constitute our primary source of liquidity and historically have been sufficient to fund our working capital, capital expenditures, and internal business expansion and debt service. We believe that our capital resources are sufficient to meet our working capital needs for the next twelve months. We expect to meet our future needs for working capital, capital expenditures, internal business expansion, debt service and any additional stock repurchases from a combination of operating cash flows and funds available under our credit facility. We also continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities that may require additional funding.
Stockholders Equity
On November 4, 2002, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program whereby we may purchase up to 1.5 million of our common shares at an aggregate price not to exceed $25.0 million. There were no stock repurchases during the six month period ended June 30, 2005.
We can purchase up to an additional 469,600 shares at an aggregate price not to exceed approximately $10.8 million under the previously authorized stock repurchase program. This repurchase program is within the limits of our current senior secured credit facility covenants. Under this program, the shares may be purchased from time-to-time in the open market. The repurchase program may be discontinued at any time at our discretion. As of June 30, 2005, we had 32.3 million shares of our common stock outstanding. In the six month period ending June 30, 2005, we granted 314,450 stock options to our eligible employees and non-employee directors.
On November 3, 2004, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the registration of approximately 11.4 million shares of common stock owned by our private equity sponsor stockholders. No members of management registered shares pursuant to this registration statement. On April 14, 2005, we announced a public offering of approximately 4.2 million shares of common stock by certain of our private equity stockholders pursuant to this Form S-3 shelf registration statement. All net proceeds from the sale went to the selling stockholders. However, we incurred all fees and expenses relating to the registration statement.
16
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES AND ESTIMATES
Our critical accounting policies remain consistent with those reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In April 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that FASB Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which requires all companies to measure compensation cost for all share-based payments (including employee stock options) at fair value, has been deferred for certain public companies. FASB Statement No. 123(R) requires companies to expense the fair value of all stock options that have future vesting provisions, are modified, or are newly granted beginning on the grant date of such options. We intend to adopt this standard January 1, 2006.
In May 2005, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which replaces Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and FASB Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. FASB No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of changes in accounting principles, requiring retrospective application to prior periods financial statements, unless it is impracticable to do so. This statement is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.
INFORMATION RELATING TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements. Statements that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions or that include words such as expects, anticipates, intends, plans, believes, estimates, suggests, and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results and performance to be materially different from any future results or performance expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include the following: our ability to attract and retain qualified nurses and other healthcare personnel, costs and availability of short-term leases for our travel nurses, demand for the healthcare services we provide, both nationally and in the regions in which we o perate, the functioning of our information systems, the effect of existing or future government regulation and federal and state legislative and enforcement initiatives on our business, the outcome of any litigation, our clients ability to pay us for our services, our ability to successfully implement our acquisition and development strategies, the effect of liabilities and other claims asserted against us, the effect of competition in the markets we serve, and other factors set forth under the caption Risk Factors in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Although we believe that these statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, we cannot guarantee future results. Given these uncertainties, the forward-looking statements discussed in this Form 10-Q might not occur. The Company does not have a policy of updating or revising forward-looking statements, and thus it should not be assumed that our silence over time means that actual events are occurring as expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements.
ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no material changes in the reported market risks since the filing of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
ITEM 4.
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon the evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
17
Commissions rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports required under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, in order to allow timely decisions regarding any required disclosure.
The evaluation has not identified any changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected or that are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 1.
The Companys Cross Country TravCorps and Cross Country Nurses, Inc. subsidiaries are the subjects of a class action lawsuit filed in the Superior Court of California in Orange County alleging, among other things, violations of certain sections of the California Labor Code, unfair competition and breach of contract. The lawsuit has not yet been certified by the court as a class action. As a result, the Company is unable at this time to determine its potential exposure. The Company intends to vigorously defend this matter.
In the six month period ending June 30, 2005, the Companys MedStaff subsidiary became the subject of a purported class action lawsuit filed on February 18, 2005 in the Superior Court of California in Riverside County. The lawsuit only relates to MedStaff corporate employees. It alleges, among other things, violations of certain sections of the California Labor Code, the California Business and Professions Code, and recovery of unpaid wages and penalties. MedStaff currently has less than 50 corporate employees in California. The plaintiffs, Maureen Petray and Carina Higareda purport to sue on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, allege that MedStaff failed, under California law, to provide meal period and rest breaks and pay for those missed meal periods and rest breaks; failed to compensate the employees for all hours worked; failed to compensate the employees for working overtime ; and failed to keep appropriate records to keep track of time worked. Plaintiffs seek, among other things, an order enjoining MedStaff from engaging in the practices challenged in the complaint; for an order for full restitution of all monies MedStaff allegedly failed to pay plaintiffs and their purported class; for interest; for certain penalties provided for by the California Labor Code; and for attorneys fees and costs. The lawsuit is in its very early stages and has not yet been certified by the court as a class action. As a result, the Company is unable to determine its potential exposure, if any, and intends to vigorously defend this matter.
The Company and its subsidiary, Cross Country TravCorps, Inc., became the subject of two medical malpractice lawsuits filed in December 2002 and March 2003, respectively, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois. Both lawsuits relate to nursing services provided by nurses supplied by Cross Country TravCorps to a hospital located in Chicago, Illinois. The lawsuits allege that the nurses supplied by Cross Country TravCorps were negligent in their care and treatment of Plaintiffs who were maternity patients at the facility in Chicago. The nurses alleged negligent failure to appropriately monitor each Plaintiff in their labor and delivery allegedly caused the minor Plaintiffs to suffer severe, permanent and disabling brain injuries. In addition to the hospital facility and physicians, the Company, Cross Country TravCorps and the individual nurses have been named as direct defendants in the lawsuits . The Company intends to vigorously defend these matters.
The Company is also subject to other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. In the opinion of management, the outcome of these other matters will not have a significant effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations.
18
ITEM 4.
SUBMISSIONS OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
(a)
The information set forth in this Item 4 relates to matters submitted to a vote at the Companys Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 11, 2005.
(b)
Not applicable.
(c)
(i)
A proposal to reelect the current directors to serve for a one year term ending in 2006 and until their successors are duly elected and qualified was approved with the following vote:
|
| Votes For |
| Votes Withheld |
|
Joseph A. Boshart | 26,838,100 | 380,969 | |||
Emil Hensel | 26,650,747 | 568,322 | |||
Eric T. Fry* |
| 26,771,003 |
| 448,066 |
|
W. Larry Cash |
| 26,452,917 |
| 766,152 |
|
Thomas C. Dircks |
| 26,591,594 |
| 627,475 |
|
C. Taylor Cole Jr. |
| 26,765,303 |
| 453,766 |
|
M. Fazle Husain |
| 26,774,488 |
| 444,581 |
|
Joseph Swedish |
| 26,562,449 |
| 656,620 |
|
Joseph Trunfio |
| 26,562,449 |
| 656,620 |
|
* Mr. Fry resigned from the Board on May 12, 2005. The Company does not currently intend to fill this vacancy.
(ii)
A proposal to ratify Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005 was approved with 27,196,769 votes for, 21,900 against and 400 abstentions.
ITEM 6.
See Exhibit Index immediately following signature page.
19
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
| CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE, INC. | |
Date: August 9, 2005 |
|
By: |
/s/ EMIL HENSEL |
|
|
| Emil Hensel Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial Officer) |
Date: August 9, 2005 |
|
By: |
/s/ DANIEL J. LEWIS |
|
|
| Daniel J. Lewis Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
20
EXHIBIT INDEX
No. |
| Description | ||
|
|
| ||
| First Amendment To Lease Agreement, dated February 24, 2005, between Blevens Family Storage, L.P. and Cross Country Seminars, Inc. | |||
| Certification Pursuant to pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14 (a) by Joseph A. Boshart, President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
| Certification Pursuant to pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14 (a) by Emil Hensel, Chief Financial Officer | |||
| Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by Joseph A. Boshart, Chief Executive Officer | |||
| Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by Emil Hensel, Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 10.1
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
LEASE AGREEMENT FOCAL POINTE BUSINESS PARK
NASHVILLE, TN
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into this 24th day of February, 2005, by and between BLEVENS FAMILY STORAGE, L.P., a Tennessee limited partnership ("Landlord") and Cross Country Seminars, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Tenant")
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, a Lease Agreement dated September 9, 2003 (the "Lease") was executed by and between Corporex Key Limited Partnership #8, a Kentucky Limited Partnership ("Corporex") and Tenant for approximately 9,070 square feet of space located at Corporex Business Park, Building A, Suite J, 1645 Murfreesboro Road, Nashville, Tennessee (the "Leased Premises"); and
WHEREAS, Landlord purchased Corporex Business Park located at 1645 Murfreesboro Road, Nashville, Tennessee by Warranty Deed of record in Instrument Number 20050105-0001668, Register's Office for Davidson County, Tennessee (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to amend the Lease to note that Tenant is expanding the Premises and Landlord has agreed to provide a Tenant improvement allowance;
WHEREAS. Landlord has renamed the Property "Focal Pointe Business Park".
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties hereby agree as set forth:
1.
Paragraph 1 (Premises) of the Lease is amended to reflect that Tenant is renting additional space located at Focal Pointe Business Park in Building A known as Suite L, consisting of approximately 3,444 square feet ("Suite L"). The Leased Premises consists of total rented space of 12,514 square feet as reflected on the revised Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
2.
Exhibit "D" of the Lease is amended to reflect the additional rental payment for Suite L shall commence on April 1, 2005 and shall end on August 31, 2007. The revised Exhibit "D" setting forth the rent payments for the Leased Premises is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
3.
Exhibit "C" of the Lease is amended to add the following paragraph:
Landlord will provide Tenant with the following repairs and alterations to Suite L:
·
Replace carpet and rubber base
·
Paint the walls and door frames
·
Construct two new offices
·
Create a doorway between suites
·
Repair damage to drywall on the outside walls
·
Make necessary repairs to the ceiling tiles lighting and mini-blinds.
4.
Paragraph 11(b) of the Lease is revised to show Tenants ProRata Share as 12.5%.
5.
Except as herein modified and amended the Lease remains in full force and effect.
6.
Executed copies of this Amendment may be transmitted by facsimile, and a copy bearing a signature transmitted by facsimile shall have the same force and effect as an original signature.
LANDLORD: | ||
Blevins Family Storage, L.P. | ||
By: | Blevins Real Estate, Inc. | |
Title: | General Partner | |
Dated: 2/24/05 | By: | /s/ J. WILLIAM BLEVENS |
J. William Blevens | ||
Title: | President | |
TENANT: | ||
Cross Country Seminars, Inc. | ||
Dated: 2/24/05 | By: | /s/ GREG GREENE |
Title: | President |
EXHIBIT "D" ANNUAL BASE RENT
The Annual Base Rent for the initial term of this Lease is as follows:
YEAR |
| ANNUAL |
| MONTHLY |
Lease Year 1 | $81,630.00 | $6,802.50 | ||
Lease Year 2 | ||||
09/01/04-02/28/05 | $99,826.02 | $6,991.46 | ||
O4/01/05-08/31/05 | $9,646.21 | |||
Lease Year 3 | $118,022.04 | $9,835.17 | ||
Lease Year 4 | $120,289.56 | $10,024.13 |
Notwithstanding Paragraph (7)(c) of this Lease, the following periods are defined to be the Lease Years.
Lease Year 1: |
| September 1, 2003 |
| through |
| August 31, 2004 |
Lease Year 2: | September 1, 2004 | through | August 31, 2005 | |||
Lease Year 3: | September 1, 2005 | through | August 31, 2006 | |||
Lease Year 4: | September 1, 2006 | through | August 31, 2007 |
In addition to the monthly installments of Annual Base Rent and Additional Rent, if any, the Tenant agrees to pay to Landlord all applicable sales, use and/or other taxes (whether Federal, State, or local), applicable to this Lease.
Initials: | |
LANDLORD: JWB | |
TENANT: GG |
EXHIBIT 31.1
Certification
I, Joseph A. Boshart, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q of Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 9, 2005
/s/ JOSEPH A. BOSHART | ||||
Joseph A. Boshart President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT 31.2
Certification
I, Emil Hensel, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q of Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 9, 2005
/s/ EMIL HENSEL | ||||
Emil Hensel Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the Periodic Report), I, Joseph A. Boshart, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: August 9, 2005
/s/ JOSEPH A. BOSHART |
|
Joseph A. Boshart |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. and will be retained by Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the Periodic Report), I, Emil Hensel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: August 9, 2005
/s/ EMIL HENSEL |
|
Emil Hensel |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. and will be retained by Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.